Anders Johansson wrote:
On Sat, 2004-02-14 at 09:51 +0200, Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) wrote:
Regardless of whether it is illegal or not to evaluate the employees via a stealth connection, we the SLE users are not the judge, jury and executioner in being able to decide whether the Romanian should be offered help or not.
Of course we are. No we are not! If we do not like the post we do not reply, or give reasons why we shouldn't help.
Offer me a job. I need one, I really do.
If you pay me, you can tell me what to do and reasonably expect me to do it. But as long as this list is a freebie, it's on an "if I feel like it" basis. Usually I feel like it, this time I don't. I'm glad to see so many people agree with me. And that is your personal opinion and you are entitled to it however as opposed to just switching off the radio when it broadcast something you disliked, you decided to give reasons why should have to turn the radio off to the poor Romanian.
If the post had originally been ignored for what it was, the amount of wasted bandwidth would have been considerably less.
Employers have a right to know what their employees do, but not covertly Oh yes they do, provided of course the employees are told that they will be monitored at various times. That way they can be 'spied' on at any time and not know if Big Brother is watching and their civil liberties are not trampled. As an example, assume Employee A plays games on his office PC but tells no one. If he could see that he was being watched he would no doubt be working and not playing games, however he can't see Big Brother covertly watching him, as they said they might be when he was employed, and so he wastes company resources.
-- The Little Helper ======================================================================== Hylton Conacher - Licenced ex-Windows user (apart from Quicken) Registered Linux user # 229959 at http://counter.li.org Currently using SuSE 9.0 Professional with KDE 3.1 ========================================================================