Re: [SLE] mozilla 1.5 spellchecker dependency, now samba3, too

Hi, I have discovered (think so ;-) ) the source of the problem. myspell-dictionary should: - be in the OpenOffice.org.rpm's "provides" list (OOo v1.0.1 default on SuSE 8.1) - not be in the list of mozilla-spellchecker.rpm's "requires" list, as in the previous versions did not exist, so why should it now? A temporary solution (until SuSE fixes this) would be to force the rpm installation (rpm -Uvh --nodeps) without dependency check when installing mozilla-spellchecker rpm. Another problem would be with the packages of Samba3 (this time this works for SuSE 8.2) downloaded from: ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/gd/8.1-i386/samba3-3.0.0/ that require "libattr.so.1(ATTR_1.0)", as opposite to the previous versions of Samba that require only "libattr.so.1" to be installed. In SuSE 8.2, libattr.so.1(ATTR_1.0) is provided by libattr-2.4.0-14.i386.rpm, so, becuase of the gcc/glib differences, I downloaded the .src.rpm from the 8.2 distribution default set of rpms, reecompiled it, and I got 3 rpms: libattr-2.4.0-14.i386.rpm, libattr-devel-2.4.0-14.i386.rpm, attr-2.4.0-14.i386.rpm, as opposite of the 8.1 rpm that had only 1 rpm called attr. Now, I cannot install either of the 2.4.0 rpms (the ones from the 8.2 set) because it breaks many dependencies due to the fact that between 8.1 and 8.2 SuSE broke the attr package into 3 different packages. Regards, Alin. Alexandr Malusek wrote:

Alin Dobre writes:

...

I have a problem: Upgrading "mozilla-spellchecker-1.5-0.i586.rpm" error: failed dependencies: myspell-dictionary is needed by mozilla-spellchecker-1.5-0

when trying to install mozilla-spellchecker 1.5. Where do I find this package for SuSE 8.1?

This problem is on SuSE 8.2 too. I don't think the package exists now. We have to wait for SuSE to fix it.

-- A.M.

-- Alin DOBRE Technical Support Engineer - RAV Division mailto:alin.dobre@ravantivirus.com Tel./Fax: +40-21-321.78.03 Hotline: +40-21-321.78.59; http://www.ravantivirus.com Worry less! RAV is watching. --------------------------- This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not copy the message or disclose its contents to anyone.