No. There is no other device using the IRQ 10 that I could tell. Is there an easy way to check for conflicting IRQs? Also, as an added note I have three boxes acting the very same way. It would be very odd if three of the them had the same IRQ conflict. Not saying that it could not be the case. On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 16:52, Christopher Mahmood wrote:
- Johnathan Bailes (johnathan.bailes@esi.baesystems.com) [021001 13:04]:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:18:68:61:76 inet addr:172.16.23.112 Bcast:172.16.23.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::210:18ff:fe68:6176/10 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:3183 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:2661 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 RX bytes:1329517 (1.2 Mb) TX bytes:522469 (510.2 Kb) Interrupt:10 Memory:f4000000-f4010000
This looks fine. Is another device using irq 10?
--
-ckm
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the archives at http://lists.suse.com Please read the FAQs: suse-linux-e-faq@suse.com
-- Johnathan Bailes BAE Systems ESI "UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things." - Doug Gwyn ---