At 10:00 AM 4/27/2001 +0200, you wrote:
* Jonathan Wilson [Thu, 19 Apr 2001 13:13:43 -0500]:
1. I was wrong to post this in the first palce - that's nothing wrong with the RPM, it's for both apache and roxen
First of all, could you in future please wrap your line at something less than 75 chars?
No, I could not. I do not like line wrapping because it messes up code examples very badly, and also on long topic-threads, line wrapping causes ugly formatting in the form of one-word and one-character lines that make things difficult to read. If you, or anyone, does not like long lines, you should find a mail reader that does the wrapping for you. I makes much more sense for people who want line wrapping to find a reader that wraps rather then asking everyone on the net to wrap it before they send. Sorry.
It makes reading your mail much easier in some text mode mail readers and it's also standard netiquette.
Sorry again, but I think maybe you'd be happier with a reader that did wrapping for you.
I don't care who says what, SOMEONE labled the roxen mod_php4 srpm as the src.rpm for mod_php4-4.0.4pl1-33.i386.rpm but it is obviously not the one SuSE used internally.
Yes, it *is* the correct source rpm, rest asured.
Bingo.
ATTN SuSE: I need the real mod_php4-4.0.4pl1-33.src.rpm , could you please put it up really soon,
Please note that your chances of reaching SuSE are much higher when sending a mail to feedback@suse.de. There are only a few employees on this list and all of them don't get paid for participating here.
True. I was just complaining - bad me :-O
And you've already got the right src.rpm ;-)
Yup.
or else explain to me why the current one says it's for the Roxen web server?
Slight error of our internal maintainer. I'll see to it tomorrow.
Well I'm not so sure there is anything wrong with it after all, is there?
Philipp
---------------------------------------------------- Jonathan Wilson System Administrator Cedar Creek Software http://www.cedarcreeksoftware.com Central Texas IT http://www.centraltexasit.com