RE: [SLE] SuSE and/or Postgresql performance

Hi Andrew:

===== Original Message From "Andrew L. Gould" =====

1. Was Sybase on the Win95 box, or were you accessing Sybase on a separate server? Was PostgreSQL and Kpsql on the same box? (I'm just trying to guage comparablility.)

Sybase was on the same box booted into Win95.

2. Does performance diminish when you use Kpsql compared to using pgsql directly?

Didn't make this comparision. Hadn't ocurred to me that KDE has substantial overhead. This could be significant since Postgresql will be a only a server to Win95 or other. Will try the comparision.

3. What other applications and services were turned on during your query? Which window manager do you use?

Using KDE. In addition to the kpsql help screen, TkDesk was running in another window.

- Andrew L. Gould

Bill Barnes wrote:

...

SuSE 6.4, Postgresql 6.5.3 (out of the suse box), Using Kpsql. AMD-K6 2/400, 96mb, Samsung Ultra DMA drive, 208k swap space ATI XPERT 98 AGP, 8mb memory.

Bill Barnes -- To unsubscribe send e-mail to suse-linux-e-unsubscribe@suse.com For additional commands send e-mail to suse-linux-e-help@suse.com Also check the FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/