On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 07:25:22PM +0100, Markus Kohm wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 19. Januar 2005 18:22 schrieb Stefan Dirsch:
Did you read /usr/share/doc/packages/fglrx/README.SuSE?
No. There was no note at the installation README, that I've to read this.
I've added this now to the README.
If you rely on such programs you might consider to add "/usr/lib/fglrx/lib" to your /etc/ld.so.conf. Make sure you insert it before /usr/lib and /usr/lib64 on AMD64.
/lib and /usr/lib are trusted directories and by default not at /etc/ld.so.conf but also searched by ldconfig (after reading /etc/ld.so.conf).
/usr/lib64 /usr/lib is mentioned on AMD64 in this file.
BTW: There's a include at /etc/ld.so.conf. So you may simply add a fglrx.conf with contents
/usr/lib/fglrx/lib
to /etc/ld.so.conf.d/. AFAIK this could be better than adding a fglrx.{sh|csh} so /etc/profile.d.
As it's the last entry it won't work on AMD64 (/usr/lib64 is before) and it didn't work for me on i386 as well. :-(
On may own machine LD_LIBRARY_PATH was set up, but glxinfo still reported the mesa indirect drivers. So it seams, that LD_LIBRARY_PATH was not searched (maby because a libGL.so was found in the ld.so.cache)?
Please attach the output of echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH ldd -v /usr/X11R6/bin/glxinfo Stefan Public Key available ------------------------------------------------------ Stefan Dirsch (Res. & Dev.) SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Tel: 0911-740 53 0 Maxfeldstraße 5 FAX: 0911-740 53 479 D-90409 Nürnberg http://www.suse.de Germany ------------------------------------------------------