On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, 11:27:23 +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:26:25AM +0100, Manfred Hollstein wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, 10:13:46 +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:10:49AM +0100, Manfred Hollstein wrote:
[...] BTW, why have glibc and glibc-devel differing version numbers on i586 and i686? These are the packages on the DVD:
i586/glibc-2.9-2.8.i586.rpm i586/glibc-devel-2.9-2.8.i586.rpm i686/glibc-2.9-2.3.i686.rpm i686/glibc-devel-2.9-2.3.i686.rpm
This would lead to an "update" for glibc using apt-get as well... Architectural "compatible" packages should have identical version numbers, shouldn't they?
Different problem... No idea.
Hmm, as it _is_ annoying, should I bugzilla this?
Yes. But I think its not changeable anymore since the media are frozen.
Thx, this is https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465662
Ciao, Marcus
Cheers. l8er manfred