perhaps because the HTML was badly formed, spam
assassin got confused, lost track of what was good/bad
and gave up? one for the vendor to look at.
--- "Carlos E. R."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
The Wednesday 2006-03-22 at 07:57 -0000, globox wrote:
what a bunch of retards these phishers are. The HTML wasn't even tested
;O)
How did that get through SuSE SpamAssassin, I wonder? Mine gave it a score of 20... and so did SuSE's:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=22.0 tagged_above=-20.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, FORGED_MUA_OIMO, FORGED_RCVD_HELO, HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_MISSING_CTYPE, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY, MIME_BOUND_DD_DIGITS, MISSING_MIMEOLE, MSGID_SPAM_CAPS, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET, SPOOF_OURI, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Level: ********************* X-Spam-Flag: YES
- -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQFEIR+ftTMYHG2NR9URApvmAJ92zpUqo7L4bt3z0lUkcKtMCGVioQCfe/WU
JEZ7DuAJ/mL6uY6OJCpE818= =lu6W -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Check the headers for your unsubscription address For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help@suse.com Security-related bug reports go to security@suse.de, not here