Klaus Kaempf (kkaempf@suse.de) wrote:
- Adam Spiers <aspiers@suse.com> [Nov 06. 2012 18:26]:
There are two package namespaces, and it only pollutes one of them. I can't think of any significant disadvantages caused by the pollution though. If you can I'd be interested to hear about them.
One is certainly loading time for
- list of package in the project
- monitor page
- status page
I suspect the differences could be measured in milliseconds not seconds ;-)
and all kinds of weird output from the search function.
Looks OK to me? $ osc se -s -V sblim-sfcb [snipped] systemsmanagement:wbem sblim-sfcb - 62 4649a7e12be11d30250a730f51eaea26 systemsmanagement:wbem sblim-sfcb-sle11-sp1 1.3.7 2 8dd9bf6f04502bf92227ba7d6cd4edb5 systemsmanagement:wbem sblim-sfcb-sle11-sp2 1.3.11 3 b145a639b5f113dce555015af4b3c7a5 systemsmanagement:wbem sblim-sfcb-unstable 1.4.2 15 ac34c8b360ee1a6894ce24f67c882fdc
But namespace pollution is certainly secondary and should not prevent us from moving forward in having multiversion in d:l:r:e
Right :) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-ruby+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-ruby+owner@opensuse.org