Gesendet: Freitag, 13. März 2020 um 13:57 Uhr Von: "Michal Kubecek"
An: opensuse-project@opensuse.org Betreff: Re: [opensuse-project] Call for a No-Confidence Vote - Re-Election of the openSUSE board
Well, apparently I'm not the only one who feels that all this effort to make things as silent as possible was a way to allow the rest of the board to save _their_ faces. And I can't blame either of the two board ex-members for changing their mind eventually and starting to defend themselves.
I don't use any names because (as Christian said that, too) that would bring somebody in a bad light. But I can say that the hottest topic was the "substantially unequal treatment" of us and the exclusion of our opinions (or ignoring). The decision was made without us and I was not allowed to stand up for myself. I had only those two options mentioned by Marina. The third option by Axel was only a joke after the resignation. I have to repeat that I have asked all Board Members (who would work with me together) in the last year whether they want to see me in the openSUSE Board again. I would not have applied if I had received a rejection. That has happened after my application period. As Christian said the process on opensuse-project was the starting point for the turnaround. I am using facts and quote what was written by others, too. The openSUSE Board has approved these facts with their email. Best regards, Sarah
Michal Kubecek
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org