Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 08:40:24PM +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
[sigh too]
Please don't tell me what to do. I shall pretend otherwise unless those definitions are culture- and language-neutral.
Is the posted list of "Harassment includes" not defined in such a manner? If not, how could it be made better?
The posted list includes the word "inappropriate", that's where it gets de-railed, because that is 100% culture- and language-specific (aka in the ear of the beholder). Jokes that are entirely appropriate in Scandinavia will be inappropriate in Germany, cause a pub-fight in Britain and imprisonment in Turkey. (just a theoretical example, no offence to anyone intended). The key issue in what Jos wrote (presumably borrowed from elsewhere?) is that it way too long, which leads to people thinking it is or should be precise. Rather than trying to define everything in minute detail, I think we should accept that it's not possible and only have a short and concise statement or policy, preferably referring to our guiding principles as jdd and Jos have already mentioned. Why not simply state that the openSUSE Guiding Principles also apply to the openSUSE conference? (as Jos did in the intro). -- Per Jessen, Zürich (18.3°C) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org