Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-project (537 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-project] openSUSE Release versioning - Poll on last three options
  • From: Helen South <helen.south@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:02:14 +1100
  • Message-id: <AANLkTikXQb8Gx6nL1We22KqoA6jE2LH=kyApDemj9tkU@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I was hoping the "old-school" vote last time would allow for a vote
this time of when to rollover:

a) 12.0, 12.1, 13.0, 13.1, etc.
b) 12.0, 12.1, 12.2, 13.0, 13.1, 13.2, 14.0 etc.
c) 12.0, 12.1, 12.2, 12.3, 13.0, 13.1, 13.2, 13.3, 14.0 etc.
c) 12.0, 12.1, 12.2, 12.3, 12.4, 13.0, 13.1, 13.2, 13.3, 13.4, 14.0 etc.

Ignoring Evergreen, my vote is a) because 12.0 would go out of support
shortly after 13.0 would come out.  So for a server etc. it might make
sense to only use the .0 releases.

If Evergreen is "real" and takes support from 18 months to 36 months,
then I would like to reset after .3 for the same reason.  ie. all .0
releases could be designated a Evergreen release and everyone would
know it.

Greg

The suggestion to use .0 to designate 'Evergreen' (or equivalent)
releases is an excellent one IMHO.

--
IRC: helen_au
helen.south@xxxxxxxxxxxx
helensouth.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >