On 21/01/2011 00:11, Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
Am 20.01.11, 14:02 +0100 schrieb jdd:
Le 20/01/2011 13:36, Kai-Uwe Behrmann a écrit :
Gnokii was not just a member who was removed, he is a nominated candidate for the board election [2].
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Board_election#Nominations:
as far as I know, he was only nominated by Nelson (and I didn't see this on any official mailing list) and during the discussion Nelson never reported this (although the discussion was so long I may have missed the fact), and we have no evidence gnokii was a candidate. However, Nelson was (is).
Here are references: http://karl-tux-stadt.de/ktuxs/?p=2971 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-project/2011-01/msg00013.html
I don't want to start again the discussion on the other aspects of this problem.
Sorry, if I just repeated things.
Well, from where I sit all conditions for nomination to be a candidate in the current election for the Board have been met. The person, S Kemter (aka Gnokii), was nominated and as per the requirements: Nominations: The election committee will take self-nominations, nominations by others and can nominate people for election. The election committee will contact the nominated people and ask them whether they are willing to stand for election. These nominations are private until accepted by the nominated people. was approached by Thomas Schmidt by e-mail to which S Kempter responded that he had accepted the nomination and gave the URL of his blog where he states that he will be atanding for the Board. All very much above board and done according to Hoyle. (But what happened after this is has a certain aroma of a dead cat about it from the comments posted about this situation.....) BC -- "To know that we know what we know, and that we do not know what we do not know, that is true knowledge." Confucius -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org