Am Freitag, 14. Januar 2011, 15:49:11 schrieb Patrick Shanahan:
* Karsten König
[01-14-11 09:45]: Am Freitag, 14. Januar 2011, 15:21:24 schrieb Patrick Shanahan:
The original post on this subject stated that numerous efforts were made to achieve compliance with the GPs w/o success. Doesn't this meet with your suggestion?
No, I think the removed person should have a right to defend itself in public after the affected parties are informed of the verdict, he doesn't have to though.
You do not think that during these "efforts" the possible consequence was not conveyed?
Quite the opposite, I am sure the board made clear what the outcome of the continous violations would be, that's also what Pascal wrote in his mail. The boards decission has the taste of a non-public trial where the boards decission is a final verdict, but usually a person has the right for public hearing in an independent trial. (far fetched but anyways: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_a_fair_trial ) The affected person can of course yield his right to a public trial, especially when he/she can predict a negative outcome. If he feels wronged though he/she should be allowed to say so. Regards, Karsten -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org