On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 14:28:50 +0200, Jos Poortvliet wrote:
On Friday 06 August 2010 22:22:35 Jim Henderson wrote:
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 20:27:15 +0200, Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
On Thursday 05 August 2010 18:10:54 Lubos Lunak wrote:
I suggest that every strategy proposal is extended to provide answers to these important questions. Without it, the discussions are just fluff talk and there is no good base for actually judging the strategy proposals.
Ok, I'll take the Lunak test for the platform proposal (http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Distribution_platform_strategy): [...]
To me, this reads like a vision statement, not a strategy. To me a strategy is about how you get there, not what you want to be.
Whatever. Details. The Lunak test gives more insight in the strategic proposal, so that's good, period. I'd love to see the other proposals go through this test ;-)
I don't disagree with that, but I think the distinction is an important one to make. When we talk about strategy, it is about how to achieve the vision - so the two are interlinked, certainly. :-) It's just not enough for me to set a goal without building a roadmap of how we get there. Jim -- Jim Henderson Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org