On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:16:45 +0200, Will Stephenson wrote:
Like you I agree that SLE should not be part of this discussion, but I wish to refute your impression in case anyone else adopts it; I and the other KDE people at Novell who participated in this discussion have studiously avoided making any such claim, or more generally using SLE for leverage in this argument.
Thanks for that clarification, Will.
Please don't denigrate this change by saying it's really about something irrelevant to openSUSE.
Please understand that is not my intention; if I had somehow gotten a mistaken impression, then it's "my bad". I don't recall who it was who had suggested that this change was to "balance" the SLE decision, but I do remember that statement pretty clearly. I'm OK with the decision as it stands and it is absolutely not my intention to revisit it. My intention was just to point out to Gerard that it's possible that some got that impression, and with that impression in mind (mistaken or not), it's easy to see the discussion as "SLE was used to justify this to some extent, but we won't now use SLE as part of the metric because the decision has been made.". I'm not saying this is the reality, but it may be the impression given. Jim -- Jim Henderson Please keep on-topic replies on the list so everyone benefits -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org