Darin Perusich-3 wrote
what is the official path for noarch extensions? If I use %{_datadir}/R/library nothing detects its contents unless set via R_LIBS. Should this variable be set somewhere in the R global environment?
There is only a single path for all R libraries, %{_rlibdir}/R/library
Is that %{_rlibdir} macro defined anywhere outside of spec files?
From what I could see each of them defines %{rlibdir} to point at %{_libdir}/R/library or %{_datadir}/R/library for noarch files (not to mention %{rdir}). The examples in the Fedora link below also show the same pattern.
Darin Perusich-3 wrote
Because the DESCRIPTION file is a %doc and we want to categorize it appropriately. Also R libraries are "self contained" which is the reason the docs reside in %{rlibdir}/%{packname} and not in %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}.
Ok, will correct that at the earliest occasion. Darin Perusich-3 wrote
In regard to versioning, since "-" is an illegal character, should "_" be used in its place? Or is "." better?
Nearly all the CRAN packages were created with R2spec, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:R?rd=Packaging/R, which substitutes "-" with "." per Fedora's versioning standard.
It seemed to me that the underscore was more frequent in the existing packages, so I used that one. Can a rule for this be inferred from other SUSE naming/versioning standards? Regards -- View this message in context: http://opensuse.14.x6.nabble.com/Subj-Packaging-R-extensions-tp5066428p50664... Sent from the opensuse-packaging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org