Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (118 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-packaging] systemd presets vs. package install order
On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 12:32 +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote:
On 15.06.2015 12:22, Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 12:16 +0200, Christian Boltz wrote:

AppArmor has a preset "enable by default" (in the separate
presets-branding-openSUSE), but unfortunately the AppArmor
installed before systemd-presets-branding-openSUSE gets

The result is: AppArmor doesn't get enabled :-(
(see also )

Can someone recommend a solution for this, or do I need to add a
"systemctl enable apparmor.service" in %post?

I'd think that would be the wrong approach.... but that's my gut

What about something like this in apparmor's post script:

if [ "$1" = "1" ]; then # This is a fresh install, not an update...
systemctl preset apparmor.service # Set the service
enable/disable as
per distribution preset

This should be ess surprising in all cases, and if the preset ever
changes, this would not even need to be changed, and still do the
thing on a new package install

If we do this, what's the purpose of the
systemd-presets-branding-openSUSE ? Shouldn't apparmor require it
directly or indirectly?

Greetings, Stephan

The idea wouldn't work anyway - as apparmor is installed prior to the
preset package and thus can't read the default.

Probably the only way around this would be to require(post) the systemd
-preset-branding package, ensuring it is there during post script
execution of apparmor (and other packages installing service files).

Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
< Previous Next >
Follow Ups