April 2012 - openSUSE Packaging - openSUSE Mailing Lists

[opensuse-packaging] build error on Apache version 2.4.1
by doiggl＠velocitynet.com.au 04 Aug '12

04 Aug '12

Hello I get a build error on Apache. The failure is as follows: . . checking whether to enable mod_lbmethod_bybusyness... shared checking whether to enable mod_lbmethod_heartbeat... shared checking which MPM to use by default... itk configure: error: MPM itk is not supported on this platform. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.U21N0a (%build) The Spec file https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=apache2.spec&package=apac… Build Log https://build.opensuse.org/package/rawlog?arch=x86_64&package=apache2&proje… Project https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=apache2&project=home%3Adoig… Sources http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi#apache24 Question: What to I alter in the spec file so Apache can finish compiling ? Thanks Glenn -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

5 6

[opensuse-packaging] update in obexd package
by Saulo Moraes 03 May '12

03 May '12

Hi, I would like to suggest an update in obexd package from Factory. In Opensuse this package is compiled to generate obexd-client and obexd-server, the server is generated with option "--with-phonebook=ebook" which requires some evolution-data-server dependencies (Gnome stuff) this is not good for KDE, XFCE and others non-Gnome users... So cheking the obexd source code I found that it can be compiled with option "--with-phonebook=dummy" that requires just libical and it dont require any specific env. dependencies and is the same paramenter that Debian and Ubuntu uses (http://packages.ubuntu.com/oneiric/obexd-server). For Fedora 18 package seems that they will not even provide obexd-server just obexd-client as their .spec have "--disable-server". My proposal is to change the package to use "--with-phonebook=dummy" instead of "--with-phonebook=ebook" and if ebook is really necessary for somebody then we can create 2 packages: obexd-server -> default obexd-server-ebook -> specific users thanks Saulo A. Moraes -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

4 10

[opensuse-packaging] How do I fix W: untranslated-desktop-file?
by Křištof Želechovski 30 Apr '12

30 Apr '12

I get the following RPMLINT warning: opensuse-manuals_en.noarch: W: untranslated-desktop-file /usr/share/kde4/apps/khelpcenter/plugins/opensuse-manuals_en.desktop Your desktop file hasn't been handled by %suse_update_desktop_file Please use it to make the desktop file translate-able by Novell translations. How do I fix this? I said %suse_update_desktop_file '%{name}' but it did not help. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 2

[opensuse-packaging] Slow publishing to the FTP/Mirrors
by Sascha Manns 30 Apr '12

30 Apr '12

Hello mates, since some time it feels like it takes hours if a already built package is published in the FTP/Mirrors. Can anyone reproduce this? Or have we any problems with that atm? cu Sascha -- Sincerly yours Sascha Manns Community Agent open-slx GmbH Web (business): http://www.open-slx.com Web (private): http://saigkill.homelinux.net -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-packaging] Packaging IcedTea 2.x for 12.2
by Robert Munteanu 30 Apr '12

30 Apr '12

Hi, Is there a plan to package IcedTea 2.x for 12.2? It seems that there is momentum building to move to JDK 7 by default [1]. If there is, I'd like to help, but the spec file [2] is a bit more complicated than the ones I usually work with. Here are a few questions: 1. Some defines are unused ; what is their purpose? %define snapshot_date 20110729 %define fedorazip openjdk-7-fcs-src-%{openjdkver}-%{openjdkdate}.zip 2. There is a FIXME regarding mauve tests and JDK 7 ; how can I verify if this is still needed? # Mauve test suite # FIXME: Is this applicable for 7? Source10: mauve-%{mauvedate}.tar.gz Source11: mauve_tests 3. What is the process of refreshing the sources for a new version? I assume that I will retrieve the icedtea archive from http://icedtea.classpath.org/download/source/ , and then refresh the openjdk, corba etc snapshots, originally %define openjdk_snapshot 0a76e5390e68 %define corba_snapshot 4d9e4fb8af09 %define hotspot_snapshot b28ae681bae0 %define jaxp_snapshot 948e734135ea %define jaxws_snapshot a2ebfdc9db7e %define jdk_snapshot 2054526dd141 %define langtools_snapshot 9b85f1265346 But how do I know which snapshot to use for a specific icedtea release? (More questions may follow) Thanks, Robert [1]: http://robilad.livejournal.com/117689.htm [2]: https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file?file=java-1_7_0-openjdk.spec&p… -- Sent from my (old) computer -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

1 0

[opensuse-packaging] Skrooge: debugfiles doesn't stripped
by Sascha Manns 28 Apr '12

28 Apr '12

Hello mates, atm i'm trying to update skrooge in KDE:Extra to 1.3.0. The Buildlog (http://tinyurl.com/bva3wmp) gives me the the information that some files in /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/ are installed, but not packaged. Has anyone an idea how to fix it? The debuginfo is enabled for these project. cu Sascha -- Sincerly yours Sascha Manns Community Agent open-slx GmbH Web (business): http://www.open-slx.com Web (private): http://saigkill.homelinux.net -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

3 3

[opensuse-packaging] Dovecot package
by Joop Boonen 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

Hi all, I do use the dovecot package. What I notice is the following. In factory only package dovecot12 and dovecot20 reside. Currently the latest stable release is 2.1.15. This package doesn't exist in Factory. I see that server:mail holds dovecot21 and outdated package dovecot. I wonder if it would be an option to put the latest stable version of dovecot in dovecot and submit it to openSUSE:Factory? Regards, Joop. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] Link-time error after moving to gcc-47
by Ilya Chernykh 27 Apr '12

27 Apr '12

Hi! I encountered a completely strange link-time error after moving to gcc-47. The linker reports "undefined reference" but does not suggest any libraries that could include the function. Even more, the function seems to be a part of the same program. The compiling stage passes well. This is the build log: https://build.opensuse.org/package/rawlog?arch=x86_64&package=pdfedit&proje… -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

5 10

[opensuse-packaging] 04-check-filelist
by Bernhard M. Wiedemann 26 Apr '12

26 Apr '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, this morning I investigated a mysterious failure of an automated test (on SLES-11-SP2 but should apply to openSUSE as well) that had been working unchanged for weeks, but there were no recent changes to the relevant components. It turned out to be, that 1. /var/lib/nova was owned by root, even though the openstack-nova package correctly had it marked as owner=nova 2. rpm -qf /var/lib/nova showed that there was a 2nd package that claimed to own it 3. we recently changed dependencies between packages, so I think that the bad package was also pulled in now and that this caused the directory to be owned by the wrong user the bad package had a line %dir %attr(0755, root, root) %{_localstatedir}/lib/nova and when I dropped it, it failed to build with ... running 04-check-filelist ... checking filelist noVNC-2012.0.99.1328944883.master.22b9a75-0.noarch.rpm: directories not owned by a package: - /var/lib/nova and I think that this fatal check was the reason for someone to add the bad line and cause this problem. For now I added a BuildRequires: openstack-nova but I think there should be a better way to tell the build system (or check scripts) that it is OK for some file to not be owned by any package. Using these pseudo BuildRequires causes extra rebuilds on OBS and all for no good reason. Ciao Bernhard M. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+XwGQACgkQSTYLOx37oWSqWgCfYDiVCp3ry7d+mj85cm/2OJZY v2wAn1H5bF9NkR2N3T0UYTFQsvylqF7x =Rr8p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1

[opensuse-packaging] Building for 11.4 is broken
by Ilya Chernykh 25 Apr '12

25 Apr '12

nothing provides cronie = 1.4.6- needed by cron -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org

2 1