On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 00:26, Greg Freemyer
All,
I want to package distorm (distorm3) from http://code.google.com/p/distorm/
The name is distorm, but the source is distributed is distorm3-1.0.zip
And the zip file expands to distorm3-1.0.
I've got a very preliminary specfile at:
Since '-' is illegal in the version number, it seems easiest to package this as distorm3.
Further, this is an application, not a library, but since its written python, should it be python-distorm?
Ok, distorm stands for "diStorm3 binary stream disassembler library", so "distorm3" is a good and valid choice for a name, esp. in view of future releases. Now the python- prefix is an other matter. (I think there was a discussion on this list about, but please correct me if I'm wrong here.) - Unconditional yes for pure libraries. - Can but not must for mixed packages (lib + app). - Can but not needed for apps. Personally, I think adding the prefix takes notthing away, but gives a clear hint of "Needs python to work". Just my 2 ct, and why. - Yamaban. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org