2010/12/8 Pavol Rusnak <prusnak@opensuse.org>:
On 07/12/10 17:07, Cristian Morales Vega wrote:
jpeg6 should be compiled from libjpeg-turbo. But it seems OK to me.
I prepared libjpeg-turbo package in my home project (home:prusnak / libjpeg-turbo) some time ago. Upstream promised to deliver 1.0.2 soon which will be compatible with both v6 and v8 API, but the project page still has only 1.0.1. If they will indeed release such version, it could help us a lot and save us headache ...
Do you mean to provide both v6 and v8 from jpeg-turbo? The problem is http://libjpeg-turbo.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/libjpeg-turbo/trunk/README-t... says the v7/v8 compatibility will not be complete (and since everybody is starting to use libjpeg-turbo I expect it to never be). IMHO if someone creates a binary linked to libjpeg.so.8 we owe him to have a 100% compatible library. The app will not have the speed boost, but that's something the binary creator should accept if he decides to not link to libjpeg.so.6. So libjpeg.so.8 should be provided from IJG's source. It could be *also* provided from jpeg-turbo so the user can change it if he decides to do so, but that would be unnecessary courtesy. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org