Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (158 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-packaging] Package Markup / Package Tagging
  • From: "Dominique Leuenberger" <Dominique.Leuenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:50:52 +0200
  • Message-id: <4C81438C020000290009A958@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 09/03/2010 at 6:35 PM, Reinhard Max <max@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 at 15:50, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:

The line is as simple as:
- Type of Patch

will there be a list of patch types to select from or will the patch
type be a free form string?

the list is limited and is what can be found on the wiki page linked.
The valid ones are:
plus a special case

- Patch filename

I think the patch name should not be repeated. It is already mentioned
in the respective "Patch:" tag and given a per spec file unique number
which the markup line(s) can refer to.

An interesting idea, indeed...

- Whom to address in case of questions re: the patch
And a short description.

Putting this all on a single line could easily violate the "lines
should not exceed 80 chars" rule if the description requires more than
a few words. So it should be allowed to continue the description on
the following lines and maybe even mandatory to start the description
on a separate line.

I'm not a big fan of multiline comments. But of course it is a valid idea, and
once we agree on a usable form, that fits for everybody, we will bow
to it :)
Having it all on one line makes automatic parsers easier though. Such scripts
DO exist already:

To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >