Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (111 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-packaging] Questions regarding branding policy
  • From: Stanislav Brabec <sbrabec@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:54:17 +0200
  • Message-id: <1208163257.3637.7.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 10. April 2008 schrieb Stanislav Brabec:
if branding-openSUSE is installed, then all packages that supplement will
be installed as well.

Then both proposal and packages already done need to move to packageand
form. I'll prepare update and fixes.

In the first case, I should have to update specs and replace the plain
supplement by the packageand(foo:branding-openSUSE).

where foo is.. ?

The name of the package, which should be branded.

Supplements: packageand(gimp:branding-openSUSE)

This is pretty urgent to fix.

Conventions updated:

I see. I will fix all remaining packages today, whenever I will have a
solution for rpm self conflict (it works for libzypp but breaks rpm).

This is the list of packages pulled into
a base system - requiring many other packages.

It should not except special cases (branding requires default theme
package). Proposal does not contain this dependency, as it would cause
dependency loop.


Supplements: packageand(gimp:branding-openSUSE)

I fixed kde*4 and I think bootsplash-branding is the only one that should
stay there.

Even this could be fixed for consistency.

glib2-branding should be fine as long as it's not requring anything and
is as tiny as it is. I think gconf-branding-openSUSE wasn't pulled because
it supplements 10.3 not 11.0.

I will fix this as well.

Best Regards / S pozdravem,

Stanislav Brabec
software developer
SUSE LINUX, s. r. o. e-mail: sbrabec@xxxxxxx
Lihovarská 1060/12 tel: +420 284 028 966, +49 911 740538747
190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 284 028 951
Czech Republic

To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >