On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Friday 15 February 2008, Ruediger Oertel wrote:
To be consistent with the "." not being wanted in a package name, a requires should not contain a "." in the REQUIRENAME unless that provides also contains a "/".
well, "foo/bar.h" would still be invalid. I've just updated the check to ignore the path part of split-provides, that should help in this case.
well, I meant to _only_ check requires and not provides. -- with kind regards (mit freundlichem Grinsen), Ruediger Oertel (ro@novell.com,ro@suse.de,bugfinder@t-online.de) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Linux Fatou 2.6.24-8-default #1 SMP 2008/02/08 10:55:16 UTC x86_64 Key fingerprint = 17DC 6553 86A7 384B 53C5 CA5C 3CE4 F2E7 23F2 B417 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)