Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (109 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-packaging] libfoo-util , libfoo-bin or libfooN-[util|bin] ?
  • From: Richard Guenther <rguenther@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:07:17 +0200 (CEST)
  • Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710121205380.4202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Cristian Rodriguez wrote:

> Hi folks:
> 
> There are several libraries that ships binary utils that are not needed
> for the library to work by itself but the library packaging policy nor
> any other document covers the naming of this packages.
> 
> so, how you think the should be called ?
> 
> libfooN-util
> 
> libfoo-util
> 
> libfoo-bin
> 
> libfooN-bin
> 
> Comments :?

libfoo-tools - at least that is what has the most existing packages
(the -tools suffix).

Richard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
Follow Ups
References