Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-packaging (109 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-packaging] Library naming
  • From: Michael Matz <matz@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 17:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
  • Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710041735090.23011@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi,

On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Michael Schroeder wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 05:37:28PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > That is how the new scheme was designed.  If libelf0-devel and 
> > libelf1-devel conflict then the name libelf-devel should have been kept.
> > (Of course there are some internal problems with that, in case both
> > libelf versions are in a single build repository.  This may be the
> > reason of the differing names.)
> > 
> > Btw, I only see libelf0 in 10.3.
> 
> But you can't know in advance if some other version will conflict
> or not, can you? So shouldn't it be libelf-devel until you know
> that different versions do not conflict?

That was the intention, yes.


Ciao,
Michael.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >