Hi Sascha, mates,
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [opensuse-marketing] Weekly News Proofreadingsession for Issue 205
From: Sascha Manns
since this issue of openSUSE Weekly News we're planning to make the profreading session more open. So everyone can read it and share his thoughts, So the Newsteam and the Marketingteam is specially invited.
Well, don't you think the sentence 'since this issue of openSUSE Weekly News we're planning to make the profreading session more open.' can be replaced with 'We have made the proofreading session of openSUSE Weekly News more open.'? ;-) This week, what concerns me are followings: =Board Election 2011= * openSUSE Board election 2011 started This article is already included in issue #204. http://news.opensuse.org/2011/12/04/opensuse-weekly-news-issue-204-is-out/#i... Do you mean to introduce this article once again consciously? =Status Updates= ==Team Reports== ===Testing Team=== * Larry Finger: Weekly News for December 10 This is linked to the older post, should be linked to http://lists.opensuse.org/archive/opensuse-testing/2011-12/msg00002.html =In the Community= ==From Ambassadors== * Michal Hrušecký: openSUSE 12.1 Launch Party in Prague I can't find his name in the Ambassadors list. http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Ambassadors_list So, I think it's better to put this article under 'In the Community' instead of here. =Tips and Tricks= ==For System Administrators== * Jörg Stephan: [UPDATE] Strange, someone has an idea? Line breaks have been removed from the paragraph: zypper in sysvinit-init Problem: sysvinit-init-2.88+-66.58.2.x86_64 conflicts with namespace:otherproviders(sbin_init) provided by systemd-sysvinit-37-3.4.1.x86_64 Solution 1: deinstallation of systemd-sysvinit-37-3.4.1.x86_64 Solution 2: do not install sysvinit-init-2.88+-66.58.2.x86_64 Choose from above solutions by number or cancel [1/2/c] (c): ... That's all I could find for this issue. BTW, since the SVN repository on BerliOS will be closed soon, I think it's time to switch our SVN repo to sourceforge, if all the involved persons are ready for the transition. Have you already confirmed that every editors can check in, chek out and commit the new sourceforge repository? If yes, why don't we work on the new repo from next issue on? Have a nice weekend! Best, -- _/_/ Satoru Matsumoto - openSUSE Member - Japan _/_/ _/_/ Marketing/Weekly News/openFATE Screening Team _/_/ _/_/ mail: helios_reds_at_gmx.net / irc: HeliosReds _/_/ _/_/ http://blog.zaq.ne.jp/opensuse/ _/_/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-marketing+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-marketing+owner@opensuse.org