Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-kubic (11 mails)

< Previous Next >
[opensuse-kubic] Weekly Kubic Project meeting minutes 2018-09-25
  • From: Rafael Fernández López <rfernandezlopez@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 17:14:54 +0200
  • Message-id: <20180925151454.GD4628@freedom>
Hello,

Another week, another minutes.

```
Meeting: Weekly Kubic Project sync meeting

Date: 2018-09-25 15:00:00 UTC

Location: IRC (chat.freenode.net, #kubic channel)

Attendees (alphabetically sorted):
* drpaneas
* ereslibre
* sysrich

Only attendees that interacted are recorded. This is an open meeting, so the
list of attendees could potentially be bigger.

Minutes:
* Default CRI runtime, upstream work for 1.13 (sysrich)
2018-09-25 17:00:40 sysrich well I've been missing the last few
meetings so to be verbose and recap some of the stuff I missed sharing
2018-09-25 17:00:48 sysrich * I think CRI-O by default has been
smooth - no negative feedback (yet?). Some informally reported issues for users
sticking with Docker, but no bug reports hindering any solution there.
2018-09-25 17:01:04 sysrich * Politically speaking SUSE received
some direct negative feedback from Docker, Inc regarding Kubic's embrace to
CRI-O. SUSE's CTO clarified to Docker, Inc that Kubic is an openSUSE community
project and SUSE does not control what openSUSE does or says. I believe the
discussions are ongoing, as SUSE seem to be keen to use this opportunity to
discuss potential improvements in the relationship between SUSE & Docker.
2018-09-25 17:01:17 sysrich * Config structuring & general kubeadm
stuff has slowed down the last week or two as I've been doing that with
upstream and they're all focused on 1.12 atm.
2018-09-25 17:01:23 sysrich * Autodetection of CRI runtime is
likely to be a kubeadm 1.13 feature
2018-09-25 17:01:29 sysrich * Our general mindset regarding how to
layer multiple configurations (CLI switches and config files in /etc and /usr)
is helping shape the discussions for 1.13 and later
2018-09-25 17:01:50 sysrich * I'm working on adding tests for
kubeadm to openQA, as well as some other Kubic-related features like
transactional-server in SLE, Leap, and TW.
2018-09-25 17:02:30 sysrich But, I'm unlikely to have upgrade
testing available before k8s 1.12 is released, so for the whole team I have a
request. Please lets make sure we do NOT submit k8s 1.12 to Factory until we've
done some manual testing of upgrading a Kubic 1.11 cluster to 1.12 using
kubeadm upgrade
2018-09-25 17:02:59 sysrich devel:kubic will be fine for k8s 1.12,
but I want to keep it out of Factory until we at least think upgrades will work
(and we can document it ;))

* `etcd-operator` (ereslibre)
2018-09-25 17:03:25 ereslibre from my side: I have been
pretty away from kubic development this last week. I am still working on the
`etcd-operator` deployment and checking how we can work with it

* `kubeadm` CRI testing (drpaneas)
2018-09-25 17:05:56 drpaneas I am going to test the new
kubeadm CRI stuff
2018-09-25 17:06:01 drpaneas that's my goal for next week
```


Cheers,
Rafa.
< Previous Next >
This Thread
  • No further messages