On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:18, Luca Beltrame
The general agreement for yesterday's meetings was:
- We will have to review our current patches - Obsolete patches can be removed, others can be upstreamed: the goal is to keep patches only for upstream fixes (e.g. in the next release) or for openSUSE specific bits - We need to set a patch policy and stick to it [snip]
Let's play devils advocate and exaggerate: - No "not annotated" patch will survive the next commit (at least outside devel:KDE) That would cast out any prior (old) not annotated patches. Hmmm. That does not sound so bad. Just which of the existing patches are really NEEDED now? What in openSUSE is not "clean" enough to "just" take Upstream tar-balls, pack them and a "minimal" spec file into obs and be done? Do "we" to do much patches in QT / X11 / basesys that we need them, or are the error that the patches should correct still the in upstream? I ask these questions, be because they will be asked, if not now then later. Better to have answers ready then. And no, I do not have the answers, but I would like to have... - Yamaban. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org