Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-gnome (69 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-gnome] Default torrentclient in Gnome
We have given Monsoon SO much time already! Why does openSUSE of all
distributions have an experimental, unstable application as a DEFAULT
selection?!? Wouldn't it really belong into the GNOME-community repo?

Well, Monsoon can stay as an optional application in the official
OSS-repo, as far as I'm concerned, but I see no reason whatsoever to
make this thing default application.

Am Dienstag, den 24.03.2009, 01:34 +0530 schrieb Atri:
Hi Steven!
What merits does Monsoon have vs. going with Transmission?

A comparison of bittorrent libraries is given here

It shows that mono-torrent (the backend of monsoon) has some features
that other (conventional) libraries do not. Additionally I think monsoon's
interface is better than transmission's. Also the RSS feed reader with
automatic torrent downloading is a really nice feature in monsoon (that
transmission lacks). Again, perhaps not much of a difference, but it is
definitely not without its pluses.

Are there
any benefits? Transmission is fully working today and has a
tremendous amount of support, is openSUSE looking to be different for
the sake of being different, or are there tangible differences?

As I said, monsoon 0.20 works fine (on my computer, at least). Also
monsoon is a project still in its infancy. More users using it will lead to
more support, abandoning it will definitely not help. It is ironical how we
use the reasoning that a project lacks support to abandon it. If a project
lacks support, we need to support it (of course, it is necessary to consider
if the project looks promising, has certain advantages and all that; and I
think monsoon does). The original reason for using monsoon as a default
included among other things

....go with Monsoon and try and grow the application. I feel it is a pretty
solid piece of kit but needs a bit of help to get even better and that will
only happen by getting more users...

I really liked this reasoning. I feel that unless it is absolutely damning,
should not be pulling the rug from under the project's feet already (which we
will be, since at present it is the default on openSUSE and not many others,
and a large percentage of monsoon's bug reports come from us, something
that will significantly go down if openSUSE stops shipping it). I think we
should give the project some more time and postpone this decision for the
present. It is not like 11.2 is being released tomorrow!

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Atri <badshah400@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Monday 23 March 2009 23:08:41 Kirill Kirillov wrote:

I'm using Transmission in openSUSE 11.1. It has Russian translation
much clear look and it's well-integrated into GNOME (it even supports
text besides icons option). The only visual glitch for me is using of
default application icon instead of its own.

In my opinion, we should give the monsoon project some more time.
Perhaps we could come back and discuss the issue of the default
client around May/June. There seems to be good work going on giving
direction to the project, and I am using the version 0.20 of the
application (from mono community repository), and it works well. Not
I have anything against transmission, but I think that having decided to
use monsoon as the default client in 11.0 we should really not judge it
based on the (small) duration between 11.0 and 11.1 (during which,
frankly, monsoon did not end up a finished product). At the moment,
though, it looks like (to me) that good work is going into it.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

GPG Key ID: C92EF367 / 1428 FE8E 1E07 DDA8 EFD7 195F DCCD
F5B3 C92E F367

Best wishes

To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >