Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-gnome (124 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-gnome] GNOME:Factory / GNOME:Factory:Next / GNOME:Stable / GNOME:Unstable etc etc
  • From: Magnus Boman <captain.magnus@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:48:55 +1100
  • Message-id: <1231876135.4149.10.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 14:23 +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 08:05 +1100, Magnus Boman wrote:

Just a quick note that we need to discuss our repos...

We have been updating latest GNOME in GNOME:Factory:Next (G:F:N) for a
while now. We need to merge these changes into GNOME:Factory (G:F).

My questions;

1. Should we copy all packages from G:F to a GNOME:Stable (I think we
have a G:S but don't know the state of it. We might want to start from
scratch here) and then update to 2.24.3

might be a good idea, I guess

2. For each GNOME . release (2.25.4, 2.25.5 etc), should we do a
complete update in G:F:N and then later merge them to G:F (Makes it
possible to use G:F as a 'stable development' branch)

I think G:F:N is good for doing the 1st mass update for a new version,
so that we don't break G:F, but once we have the unstable in G:F, I
guess we can just update there, and have G:F:N be just a link to G:F, so
that packages get built for 11.1

G:F already builds for 11.1 so no need to keep G:F:N around for that. I
still think it'd be a good idea to do the updates in G:U and then merge
with G:F as it would allow us to create LiveCD's after each dot release
from G:F.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
Follow Ups