Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-gnome (77 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-gnome] Weekly duties for Gnome-Meeting
  • From: Vincent Untz <vuntz@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 12:18:26 +0200
  • Message-id: <20080603101826.GF27426@xxxxxxxxx>

Le mardi 03 juin 2008, à 10:34 +0200, Casual J. Programmer a écrit :
Hello all,

I have reason to reconsider my cooperation with the openSUSE-GNOME team
as it appears, that fruitful and honest cooperation is not wanted.

jpr seems to be content to fiddle with bug reports to his hearts content
and does not deem it necessary to apologize if critized for it.

Instead critical remarks get edited out, to be seen at

Bug 395445 Bug 394408

I have no idea what has been going on there since I've never looked at
those two bugs before -- so keep in mind that I might be missing some
points :-)

When I read the description of both bugs, my first feeling is that they
are different bugs and I only start thinking they are duplicates when I
read comment #7 in bug #394408, which might explain why JP did unmark
the other bug as duplicate.

Also, the general rule that the newer bug should be marked as duplicate
of the older bug is only a guideline and there are many many cases where
I've done the opposite on since I've started triaging
bugs in GNOME, so I can imagine it's the same on bnc. In this specific
case, for example, Scott had analyzed the causes of the bug on the newer

So, to me, it just looks like the main issue here was that the bug you
reported was not well-identified/understood at the beginning.


Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
Follow Ups