Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (435 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-factory] [RFC] OpenSUSE Distribution Tiers Policy
On Fri, 2020-07-03 at 18:30 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Fri 2020-07-03, Neal Gompa wrote:
I think we should just straight up drop this idea of tiering. Is
there a good reason we can't just go with primary and secondary
architectures as other distros (Debian, Fedora, etc.) do?

I don't know what inspired Dirk, but FreeBSD, for example, has
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/archs.html
and https://www.freebsd.org/platforms/


My primary input on naming is to avoid "premium". Beyond that, I
go with Shakespeare: "A rose by another name" ;-)

Definitely not the Goal Gerald, I was able to get information from non-
SSE components (e.g. KDE) that aarch64 can be supported.

I suppose I couldn't get such confirmation e.g. on RISC V. So this is a
pledge to user, that we "are able to" provide the best effort on
supporting the software.


Gerald

N�����r��y隊Z)z{.���r�+�맲��r��z�^�ˬz��N�(�֜��^� ޭ隊Z)z{.���r�+��0�����Ǩ�
< Previous Next >