Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (435 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-factory] [RFC] OpenSUSE Distribution Tiers Policy

On 7/4/20 9:33 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 3:54 PM Dirk Müller <dirk@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Neal,

Am Fr., 3. Juli 2020 um 20:11 Uhr schrieb Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>:

'Primary Architecture' and
'Architecture port'.
To me, this doesn't make sense because they're both ports, in essence.

Only one of the two is called that way ;)

I admit I'm lacking a better wording. I am struggling with the Fedora
and Debian wordings (and I think I mentioned that in an earlier
and 'port' however bad or misplaced it may be, at least has some
'openSUSE' historic meaning (and as I got pointed out, this conflicts
quite a bit with the *BSD definition of ports).

I don't want this to become a naming bikeshedding exercise, so if
anyone has a better suggestion, I happily take it. Otherwise thats
what it is for now.

What do we need the distinction for?

We don't support all Architectures equally, having a clear way to show
users what level of support they can expect for each architecture seems
pretty sensible, maybe you could get away from needing to come up with
names by providing some form of reference table instead, but 2
categories with names probably meets our current needs.

Simon Lees (Simotek)

Emergency Update Team
SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30
GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B

< Previous Next >