Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (468 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: [opensuse-project] Bringing Leap and SUSE Linux Enterprise closer together - a proposal
On Thu, 2020-04-09 at 15:14 +0200, Stasiek Michalski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 14:30, Adrian Schröter <adrian@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Donnerstag, 9. April 2020, 14:09:22 CEST wrote Stasiek
This does seem like a much more SLE focused than openSUSE Leap
transition, branded as a positive change for openSUSE, but at
did not excuse yourself with Coronavirus as did The Qt Company

How do we figure out branding, how do we package things that
have to differ between SLE and Jump? I do see the last question
kind of
skipping that point, does that mean the installation-images
be different to account for different branding? Will the product
package differ? Will the branding be figured out based on

Nah, branding is done with a different set of packages. openSUSE
definitive have it's own are of additional and also fork packages.
The latter ones are the ones we try to minimize though.

I will drill this part, since it's the most interesting to me. If we
shared 100% of binaries we would have SLE, not Jump in the
so I assume we are gonna diverge somewhere. Which package will have a
dependency on branding-openSUSE and distribution-logos-openSUSE-Leap
(and if you want Jump if I get that branding going) so that branding
included in the installation images and the installed system. What
statement in which package will decide which package to build for

Hello Stasiek,

I tried to touch this in Q. How will the difference between SLE and
openSUSE be addressed?

Perhaps it's worth a page simlar to openSUSE Packaging Guidelines.
Where we could elaborate and share some of the best practices.

LCP [Stasiek]

Best regards

Luboš Kocman

Release Manager openSUSE Leap

SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5
90409 Nuremberg

(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Managing Director: Felix Imendörffer
< Previous Next >