On Thu, 2019-10-17 at 13:33 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Thursday 2019-10-17 13:19, Simon Lees wrote:
On 10/17/19 9:43 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Thursday 2019-10-17 11:30, Simon Lees wrote:
Based upon this established process and my recollection of the prior responses, I have come to the conclusion that my position has a larger share of supporters. This is presented in the overview.
Yes but in this case you didn't count the implicit non responses, I don't expect that everyone who agree's with a proposal such as removing rpm groups needs to add a +1 to the email thread
By your very argumentation, you also should not expect that everyone who agrees with my proposition needs to add a +1 to the thread. So it's fair to say that you can't just count 490 non-respondents as agreements for a removal.
I would expect that people who object to a proposal should raise there objections as a small number of people did.
And that's what I did for the removal proposal. So, we're even? Hi
I see that this is getting a bit emotional - maybe its time to take a deep breath and try to calm down a bit. Cheers Martin