On 22/11/2018 02:24, Marco Calistri wrote:
Il 21/11/2018 11:32, Carlos E. R. ha scritto:
On 21/11/2018 14.21, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 14:07:13 +0100, "Carlos E. R." <> wrote:
Chrony uses half the resident size than ntpd (top output). But more than twice virtual memory Yes, but as Stefan Seyfried says, that is not relevant, it is not occupy ram chips.
The other output is from "ps", I guess; I don't know there what "SIZE" means, what exact concept. :-? The SIZE and RSS fields don't count some parts of a process including the page tables, kernel stack, struct thread_info, and struct task_struct. This is usually at least 20 KiB of memory that is always resident. SIZE is the virtual size of the process (code+data+stack). Ah, it counts virtual size too. Then it is not useful for this comparison.
Carlos,
Be warned that "somebody" could complain about the fact that you are taking the space of the factory list for "not pretty development topics" :-)
Cheers,
I will be that somebody, guys this is the third or forth thread in a row where the same group of people have caused a thread of 10+ emails within a day that are not related to the development of openSUSE please stop. Consider this your last warning before I escalate it to the board. -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org