Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (536 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-factory] mutt 1.9.1 reports itself as neomutt ???
On 2018-05-30T23:32:08, Patrick Shanahan <paka@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

then if it is neomutt, it should be packaged as neomutt, not mutt

Fair. I prefer neomutt by far (and am amused, because I still remember
how mutt started as patches to elm) with the whole search and other
stuff build in, but if there are two distinct projects, they shouldn't
be conflated like this.

it does matter and we do not need all the neomutt patches. and neomutt is
not copyright Michael Elkins, mutt is.

It still is mostly Michael's copyright of course.

the package is fscked and needs fixing, it doesn't even report the correct

Open a bugzilla and submit a new mutt package and a rename of the
current mutt to neomutt?

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imend├Ârffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284
(AG N├╝rnberg)
"Architects should open possibilities and not determine everything." (Ueli
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
Follow Ups