Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (394 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-factory] Request 545194 would cause drop of fortune
Dr. Werner Fink píše v Út 28. 11. 2017 v 10:19 +0100:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 03:32:58AM +0000, Dmitriy A. Perlow wrote:
Tue, 28 Nov 2017 01:09:35 +0300 Simon Lees <sflees@xxxxxxx>
напісаў(ла):



On 28/11/17 08:30, Bjoern Voigt wrote:
Dr. Werner Fink wrote:
there is a drop request against fortune[1]. I'd like to vote
not
to drop
fortune even it it does not use iconv but recode.


Werner

[1] https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/545194

Could anyone please explain, why the Recode dependency of
Fortune is a
problem?

Should Recode be dropped and why?


Recode is being dropped simply because it currently has no
maintainer,
for a package to be in openSUSE someone has to commit to maintain
it.
Whoever was doing this in the past doesn't want to anymore, so
either
someone else steps in to maintain it or it gets dropped.

OK. So if I take the maintainership will nothing be dropped? Is any
real
problem about recode?

Not that I'm aware ... I've compared with recode package from Debian
at
https://packages.debian.org/sid/recode and found similar patches and
also a few more[1]. Only the Url http://recode.progiciels-bpi.ca
seems to
be dead but on github there is a perfect replacement https://github.c
om/pinard/Recode/

If you like to become a maintainer I can set you as
maintainer/bugowner
of package recode


Francois is dead. So even if you have github you need to fork it and
develop in there.

Anyway, it is 2 months now and neither nobody took over recode nor
fortune got updated to not rely on recode. So what is the plan?

Also based on OBS data there is not even maintainer of the fortune
itself should I again proceed with the drop as people planned only just
to complain?

Cheers

Tom
< Previous Next >
Follow Ups