On Wed, Oct 04, Anton Aylward wrote:
On 04/10/17 07:38 AM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2017-10-04 13:16, Richard Brown wrote:
For systems with a read-write rootfs, we will be slightly bending the rules of the FHS, in the sense that the FHS claims /usr should be 'read-only data'
What about machines that share /usr from a central machine over the network?
Indeed! This was the original purpose of /usr/share and many today still use it that way, consolidating centrally thing like the manual pages that apply EQUALLY to all machines.
/usr/share is only for exact identically installations. The FHS clearly states that /usr/share is not shareable between different versions.
If you want a BtrFS rollback location /etc is better.
No, everything outside /usr is no option, why do you think did Red Hat choose a location on /usr? And this has nothing todo with Btrfs, it's a problem all rollback solutions have. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk, Distinguished Engineer, Senior Architect SLES & CaaSP SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org