Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (367 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-factory] MonoDevelop
  • From: Mykola Krachkovsky <w01dnick@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2017 23:30:15 +0300
  • Message-id: <1646346.llRO73yKdm@thaumaturge>
субота, 8 липня 2017 р. 13:37:01 EEST Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar
On Sat, 2017-07-08 at 11:11 +0300, Mykola Krachkovsky wrote:

I've noticed MonoDevelop is going to be removed on zypper dup. And
there is no
monodevelop in openSUSE:Factory, Mono and Mono:Factory have broken
packages as they are linked to openSUSE:Factory/monodevelop.

I can't find any news/proposition for deletion of monodevelop. Was it
accidentally or on purpose? Or maybe something other changed?

This was deleted on the request of the maintainer:

osc rq show 507501
Request: #507501

delete: openSUSE:Factory/monodevelop

I don't see a comeback of this via traditional Linux packaging.

State: accepted 2017-07-04T09:55:44 dimstar_suse
Comment: Accept to openSUSE:Factory

History: 2017-07-04T09:55:44 dimstar_suse Request got accepted
2017-07-04T09:55:43 dimstar_suse Request got reviewed
2017-07-04T09:55:43 dimstar_suse Review got accepted
2017-07-01T14:01:02 factory-repo-checker Review got accepted
2017-07-01T13:20:29 staging-bot Review got accepted
2017-07-01T13:20:27 staging-bot Request got a new review
2017-07-01T11:31:03 licensedigger Review got accepted
2017-07-01T11:29:54 factory-auto Review got accepted
2017-07-01T11:29:54 factory-auto Request got a new review
2017-07-01T11:29:39 Mailaender Request created


So from now we should use flatpak from site, that's right? That's a bad news.
But what is preventing from building it from sources?
And shouldn't Mono(:Factory)/monodevelop be deleted also, should they? As they
are broken anyway.

Kind regards,
Mykola Krachkovsky
Найкращі побажання,
Микола Крачковський
< Previous Next >
Follow Ups