2 Jun
2017
2 Jun
'17
11:36
On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 10:51 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
I wonder why we even allow this to happen.
The :Ports are under the control of the respective teams caring for them - from a TW release process I try to support them as good as I can, but we don't confine them into a cage. The Ports are mostly built around their own community. This does not mean that I would not constantly moan at those local packages - I do see a 'temporary' reason for them, when trying to 'unblock' a specific arch. But > 200 is definitively a step in the wrong direction. Cheers, Dominique