Il 22/04/2017 11:24, Rüdiger Meier ha scritto:
On 04/22/2017 04:16 PM, Anton Aylward wrote:
On 22/04/17 09:27 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
If I had my druthers, next would be Opensuse 1501, 1502, 1503, 1601, 1602, 1603, 1701, etc.; or 151, 152, 153, 161, 162, 163, 171, etc.
Yes, we should definitely stick with numbers. Not animals, not cypto-dates, not alliterations. A nice, regular monotonic sequence. Keep the mathematicians happy.
I agree, numbers are good enough as long as they are randomly ordered to keep to our scheme consistent.
cu, Rudi
Sorry if I permitting myself to express my humble opinion among a bunch of literally "Genius Developers" as many of you are, but why you don't adopt similar names schemes as Windows does: I.E.: Windows 10 build(xxxx) We will have in this way an "OpenSUSE Leap build (what-you-prefer-to-put-in-here)" to track the update version of the release. Or, in the evenience that by naming the "Windows" word could raise some irritations in this M.L., why you don't adopt the Tumbleweed simpler scheme of release naming also for Leap? marco@linux-turion64:~> cat /etc/os-release NAME="openSUSE Tumbleweed" # VERSION="20170419" ID=opensuse ID_LIKE="suse" VERSION_ID="20170419" So we will get "OpenSUSE Leap version 201704" Then since I have understood that Lap has a cycle-of-life of three years, the next Leap would be: "OpenSUSE Leap version 202004" :-) Have a nice week-end! -- Marco Calistri Opensuse Tumbleweed 64 bit Intel® Core™ i5-2410M CPU @ 2.30GHz × 4 Intel® Sandybridge Mobile