Dne čtvrtek 20. dubna 2017 15:41:03 CEST, Marco Calistri napsal(a):
Il 20/04/2017 03:59, Vojtěch Zeisek ha scritto:
Dne středa 19. dubna 2017 22:39:14 CEST, Stefan Seyfried napsal(a):
Am 19.04.2017 um 22:00 schrieb Carlos E. R.:
On 2017-04-19 20:38, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
Not good.
I would expect different installations on different hardware.
To exaggerate:
You install 3 servers HP Lenovo Dell
You do exactly the same on all three machines. In the end, you expect them to have hugely different software selections?
The HP running apache, Lenovo running nginx and Dell running gatling as a web server?
I would be very surprised.
This is not the case. You install on ~7 years old netbook with Intel Atom and 2 GB RAM. KDE/GNOME won't run smooth there. This is place for e.g. XFCE to take the job. Rest can be the same (Firefox, LO, ...). This idea has nothing to do with servers. Of course, user should be noted about this.
IMHO there are also additional considerations beside the DE to take into account when installing openSUSE or even other distro on an old and limited HW device:
1) High CPU consuming applications as for example the gnome-tracker
Well, yes and no. Firefox will be very same in each DE. I don't think it is reasonable to select different browser, office suite, etc. Gnome-tracker and similar tools are DE-specific. So that problem is solved mostly by selecting appropriate DE.
2) Not good performing kernel scheduler [cfq] instead of the more performing [bfq] for example
I thought it is automatically selected according to type of hard disk. At least it is my observation. If so, it'd be nice precedence case. :-)
May be not so easy to track it down before installing the O.S.
I wouldn't go to such a deep details. I don't think the issue is really big. -- Vojtěch Zeisek Komunita openSUSE GNU/Linuxu Community of the openSUSE GNU/Linux https://www.opensuse.org/ https://trapa.cz/