Dominique Leuenberger / DimStar wrote:
On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 20:09 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote:
How much needs to go into minimal? I bet we can find users that claim the current pattern is still too large.
Yep. That's why calling it a "server" pattern is a good thing.
Well, then the name should still have "minimal" on it. Something like "Text Server (minimal) pattern".
Why? The current pattern gives you a functional setup which you are likely to use on a server; thanks to sshd being there you can even use it on a remote box and 'keep on configuring what you need'. Adding 'minimal' to the name only opens the door for flames that it's 'too big' and 'this and that should not be in'
I agree, that pattern is in a very good shape right now. I think the only significant changes I make when I use it is to add syslog-ng and man-pages. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (17.9°C) http://www.hostsuisse.com/ - virtual servers, made in Switzerland. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org