On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 01:11:47 -0600
Rajko
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:04:58 +0100 Antonio Larrosa
wrote: Even if it's possible to look in the page history and revert the change, it's better if those problems can be prevented before happening (less work => more happiness :) )
To make discussion where to keep OSEP shorter here is example of wiki variant: https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:OSEP_0001 which is listed at: https://en.opensuse.org/Portal:OSEP and https://en.opensuse.org/Category:OSEP I followed what Henne said, which is not optimal as "openSUSE:" namespace is not protected with Flagged Reviews, in other words document must be protected in a classic way, which is already done. Changes are not possible for new and not registered users. Next level would be to make only admins able to change text, which can be applied when final version is available. Portal can be arranged in different ways. Current is only to illustrate different options to list OSEP. OSEP 0001 is listed in fixed text mode, the same used in ML, which is not optimal. RFC, which is model for OSEP, was created at different time with a lot lesser common infrastructure that can be accessed by everyone, so it is used fixed text with some fields dedicated to manual version control. I don't think we need that this days. Web browser is ubiquitous, wiki has a version control, and OSEP should reflect that. -- Regards, Rajko. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org