In article <52A845C9.8050108@suse.de>, Antonio Larrosa <alarrosa@suse.de> writes:
Antonio> Hi all, Antonio> We got lots of feedback from you all, also on the process. Many did not Antonio> appreciate the long and complicated emails. We discussed this in the Antonio> team and Tomáš Chvátal told us how Gentoo shares a nicely documented Antonio> change process with Python and Debian already. Essentially, they use a Antonio> standardized document which ensures that whenever something has to be Antonio> discussed, all information is there right at the start. This shortens Antonio> discussions, avoids bikeshedding (see [1]) and afterwards you have a Antonio> nice stash of proper proposals in archive. Antonio> The proposal is essentially based off of the Python Antonio> document, simplified and adapted to openSUSE. It does not Antonio> change how decisions are made or by who, just speeds up the Antonio> process, keeps the discussions clean and documents their Antonio> results thus avoiding future flames. We think it would be Antonio> great for openSUSE to adapt them. Antonio> Attached to this mail there's a draft with a recursive OSEP Antonio> in the proper, proposed form, let us know what you think Antonio> ;-) Does Gentoo or from whomever else you are taking the ideas have a timing policy of sending proposals, or RFC or what ever name you want to give. Do they also bombard with idea after idea without letting anything to settle down. I started to have the feeling that the openSUSE team has a deadline or an obligation to SUSE to achieve something or at least to show there is tangible events within this calendar year (2013). Togan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org