Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (776 mails)
< Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: [opensuse-kernel] BtrFS as default fs?
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:56:20 +0200
- Message-id: <20130912145620.GC14664@quack.suse.cz>
[trimmed CC list a bit]
On Wed 11-09-13 14:52:45, Claudio Freire wrote:
linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. I'd be interested in tracking that down because
I (and I believe other ext4 developers as well) am not aware of this.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed 11-09-13 14:52:45, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:16 AM, Dirk Müller <dirk@xxxxxxxx> wrote:Do you have any data to share? Preferably also with
Besides Scalability there are other attributes where
btrfs exceeds other filesystems.
Regarding the scalability part, lets not compare something from 3
years ago, lets compare the 13.1 kernel, kernel 3.11.0. Ext4 has had
pretty nice improvements in 3.11 regarding scalability, see
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1307.0/00286.html for
details.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_311_filesystems
You might or not like this benchmark, but the headline is pretty
clear: "EXT4 wins".
And, they didn't check, but at least for database workloads ext3 beats
ext4.
linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. I'd be interested in tracking that down because
I (and I believe other ext4 developers as well) am not aware of this.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
< Previous | Next > |