Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (776 mails)
< Previous | Next > |
Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: [opensuse-kernel] BtrFS as default fs?
- From: Michael Schroeder <mls@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 19:07:46 +0200
- Message-id: <20130906170746.GA24079@suse.de>
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 07:04:35PM +0200, Matthias G. Eckermann wrote:
Not really. "Scalability" in the sense of huge amounts of small
files sense means exactly "Performance" for me, as that's where
XFS before was dog slow, i.e. it didn't *scale".
M.
--
Michael Schroeder mls@xxxxxxx
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF Jeff Hawn, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg
main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);}
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
I am afraid, we have a wording issue here:
When Dave says "Scalability" in that presentations, he
means "Performance" (see his slides).
When I say "Scalability" above, and use that word
comparing btrfs to the current openSUSE default, I am not
talking Performance, but talking about "Scalability" in
the sense of filesystem size, dealing with huge amounts of
(small) files, ...
Hope this explains the different view.
Not really. "Scalability" in the sense of huge amounts of small
files sense means exactly "Performance" for me, as that's where
XFS before was dog slow, i.e. it didn't *scale".
M.
--
Michael Schroeder mls@xxxxxxx
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF Jeff Hawn, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg
main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);}
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
< Previous | Next > |