Dnia 14-04-2010 o 23:07:26 Stefan Seyfried
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:19:36 +0200 Rastislav Krupanský
wrote: The most problem is that qt and gtk yast are inconsistent and looks like two completely different applications. This should be resolved. Then users wouldn´t face the dilemma which one is better.
Maybe having choice is good ;)
If that means that gtk yast is changed to behave like QT yast, then I won't complain. But if QT yast is changed to behave like gtk one... that would be disastrous ;)
Let's have a flamewar, I didn't have one for a long time ;-) . I'd willingly answer questions in a survey. Survey with mockups and a lot of questions. Of course, I can use custom built SUSE from Studio, where I can put yast2-gtk by default to an ISO containing only KDE4, but that's not a solution, it's a workaround (just like using Banshee to manage multimedia devices because Amarok can't do anything). Hm, now I'm thinking, the survey would be a great idea. Survey writers would have to denote differences between GTK and Qt versions of YaST, dis- and advantages of both, compare and mix everything to create one big survey. And then we'd have a consensus, probably. -- Best regards, Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek http://blog.jakubrusinek.pl/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org